[Author’s note: This may sound irrelevant to some (What, no libraries? Who cares!), but bare in mind what “no libraries” implies: medieval primitivism and/or social chaos – good luck amusing yourself honestly under those conditions! Plus, as old hippies may recall, this motto once dealt with smoking good old weed, Cannabis called Sativa: a Sanskrit honorific reserved for rice and a few other beneficial plants, unless I’m mistaken.]
Neither an art nor a science, library science is wreathed in classical obsolescence. Outmoded routines are commonplace in libraries — not because they are particularly valid but because funding for better systems outstrips the pittance they’ve been reluctantly authorized.
It is quite a chore to scan and digitize books after they've been printed on paper. Better to distribute them in a cheaper, digitized format to begin with and then publish them on paper as a luxury gift on demand.
A comfortable set of digital reading glasses could have been invented (Google Glass?) — reading glasses similar to sunglasses, that would display pages of easy-to-read text beautifully inscribed as if on fine vellum: font optional, controllably lit, keyword searchable, indexed and magnified on demand. Those digital sunglasses could display a virtual keyboard and screen, and a pair of virtual typing hands wire-guided from ring-fingered or gloved-hand input leads. A belt-mounted CPU controller with docks for portable memory and other hardware connections; an EEG helmet, the fingers, the glasses and their CPU connected by optical cable or wireless.
Finally! No more painful reading sessions holding a book overhead or sitting up in bed. Images from these sunglasses could be projected onto a darkened ceiling or a bedroom wall. They could become transparent and perhaps magnify the outside world, or register different frequencies of invisible light, or project data fields in three dimensions. The possibilities are endless.
We have none of it. Instead, we should admire our genius at aiming long-range weapons through murky combat and the gloom of night. In Vietnam in 1969, the average infantry squad was equipped with infrared night vision goggles. In 2011, most firemen still hadn’t been issued them to find survivors in a fire. What warped priorities!
Libraries work better on a subsidized and cooperative basis (as do other public utilities and as would many functions not yet recognized as such, like healthcare.) Instead, they are expected to generate entrepreneurial profits as if they were peddling soda pop, private automobiles, strip mining, fracking, runaway genetic engineering or some other compulsive corporate profit.
Most librarians are altruistic servants rather than gladiatorial power brokers. They would rather provide excellent service than accumulate wealth and power. Given the vampire nature of weapon bureaucracies, information managers get at best afterthought consideration. They are the first to bare their necks to the economizing ax and will be the last to benefit from budget windfalls.
We can note this vulnerability in the Library of Congress. Supposed to house one of the largest book collections in the world, it is really a Swiss cheese of lost and stolen books. As each term of Congress expired, defeated incumbents and their family took their favorite books home with them: a consolation prize for having legislated the rat race. Worse yet, global book devotees paid huge sums to bribe clerical staff and make off with irreplaceable titles.
Let’s turn from the Masters of Greed to their apprentices. College students were assigned reading lists for their courses. The most ambitious ones hoarded key university texts set aside in library reserve. That way, their grade-point competitors couldn’t consult them. Nowadays, computerized book-tracking foils their petty schemes. But not so long ago, those crooked over-achievers carved up the competition, got better grades and graduated to become life-and-death decision-makers. In this manner, a whole generation of crooked reactionaries managed to take over our courts, legislatures, universities, corporate and media boards.
A political takeover by reactionary sociopaths has resulted from this unsupervised academic tolerance. Then these ne'er-do-wells recruited morality-crippled subordinates as their protégés and replacements. It turns out that psychopaths are the only people who enjoy working under very bad bosses, while everyone else hates to do so. Plus their bad example, advice and career “guidance” corrupted ethical fence sitters: majorities within those professional communities. Honest people got fired out of hand. This accretion of bad habits has sapped orthodox leadership.
Librarians aren’t competitive to begin with, plus they tend to be encyclopedic Learners. Their “service” mind-set simplifies weapon management’s takeover of their resources. Masters of Business Administration consider information gathering a secondary, service function. When crunch time comes, corporate libraries and research facilities are the first to undergo funding cuts.
They restrict their studies to one “major” topic (another crippling constraint of weapons education) only once their employers demand this sacrifice. While libraries attract less competitive professionals (though no less competent), weapon managers sponsor the best-paid research for military applications. Weapon technology has become the intellectual Super Bowl, if you will, whereas creative intellect becomes the stuff of throwaway hobbies. “Trivial pursuit” indeed, in a world designed for a majority of TV-stupidified zombies.
Learners are drawn by their natural curiosity into the friendly intellectual anarchy of libraries. In these beehives of thought, the pollen of potential insight gets transformed into a honey of kinetic wealth. This seedbed of new ideas suffers from blatant neglect, shortsighted exploitation and disregard for true values, in spite of the desperate optimism of frontline librarians. If weapon science is the prince of modern resources, library science must be the pauper.
Institutional degeneracy has a lot to do with the law of diminishing returns. In most cases, the first effort produces the greatest end-result; results on the margins later on require a lot more effort.
Libraries get by with a lot less funding than they would get from a peace civilization and are nowhere near fulfilling their full potential. On the other hand, over-funded weapon technologies have catapulted themselves beyond the twilight zone of diminishing returns into insatiable limbo. Obsessively, compulsively, repeatedly and endlessly, we’ve polished our killing systems at the expense of learning systems and optimized the threat formula to the exclusion of the armchair formula.
Learner Networks could confirm or deny every hypothesis much more readily. Learners will concentrate on their topic of passion and share it with like-minded enthusiasts. In a large number of small-scale production facilities and labs, inventors will design working experiments, prototypes and models of their most recent invention, seconded by Learner engineers whose topic of passion would be their manufacture. Three-D printing, my Learner friends.
We will get only one chance to summon this incredible wealth. Current institutions are locked in their own incompetence. Short of bloody revolution, they benefit from the stability of official monopoly, no matter how squalid their results (whether because of corrupt ethics or inexcusable outcomes). New Learner Networks will need to confirm their superiority right away. Otherwise, they’ll be destroyed by wastrel “conservatives.”
Good solutions to our worst problems won’t emerge in sufficient number until talented contributors rally to Learner Networks. First priority: the Network itself, how best to handle this avalanche of new data.
Beginning their studies at the earliest possible age, most Learners will earn a doctoral degree by the time they reach puberty, or several equivalents. This said, no timed “race” to achieve personal goals will be imposed. Late bloomers (like me) will be granted all the time they need; faster Learners, more concentrated Learning. It will take most people a third the time to become a productive Learner, that it takes today’s candidates to graduate into tiny info elites.
“A Doctoral degree” is our crude yardstick of cultural achievement. Seniority and faculty tenure will cease to influence this system. Peer privilege and senior approval will turn into honorary ornaments. Arbitrary performance criteria won’t dictate financial security nor will they restrict access to the Network. Everyone will merit accelerated Learning and flight from their misery regardless of their provenance, productivity and credentials.
Every city will broadcast a complete video collection of local drama, music and art along with guided video tours of local museums, conventions and stores. Detailed analysis will cover every regional craft, hobby and industry. Complete university curricula (from elementary topics to post-graduate coursework) will be available in realtime, locally, on-call for private review at any hour. Other cities’ equivalents will take moments longer to access. All this will be free, free, free! Profits drawn indirectly from these activities will be exponentially greater than direct profits derived from current “education” institutions.
Nowadays, it is illegal to audit, record and rebroadcast most classes and performances! The total control of content emanates from a few toney skyscrapers rather than from every living room and study cubicle. A handful of centralized TV networks, movie studios and elite universities dictate the total content of pop culture. No wonder its output is so dreary, dumb and irrelevant!
This monologue blares on without letup. Too little contrapuntal crosstalk refines our public reality. A few media moguls “control” almost everything broadcast and in print. They act like surveyors blinded by aiming their theodolite at the mercantile sun for too long. Their error-strewn maps, published in millions of baffling copies, only serve to mislead us.
“What would you do with yourself if you became extraordinarily rich? Researchers studied a sampling of the newly rich and concluded: you’d probably change jobs to learn something you’d always wanted to learn, and turn yourself into a genuine expert in your new field.” From Mike Mailway (pseudonym for LM Boyd), Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 04/6/92.
What most people would accomplish if rare good fortune smiled on them, society should mass-produce for public consumption. Mass Learning, not the no-win alternatives of empty “entertainment” and torturous, competitive schooling. Economies of scale, my children. In addition, every dollar spent on this lavish project will generate many more in new discoveries.
If we make our way along this road for a little while longer, PeaceWorld will roll over the horizon and bid us welcome.