Every child undergoes aversion training against peace. As a result, we adults prevent world peace by refusing to sort our info politics into their weapons and peace components.

I cut short correspondence with a "progressive" who concluded that there wouldn’t be World Peace for at least forty more years: the time it would take to eliminate his responsibility for it, since by that time he would be retired or gone. According to him, people are just not ready for it, they’re not blessed with his obviously superior morality…

Out of pity, I won’t finger him. I never was any good at remembering names ― good riddance! After all, his was a general malpractice, not an exceptional one. In most cases of institutional evil, the responsible party is never pointed out for fear of his reprisal or that of his supporters. The moment the weak come to harm, Learners should call out those responsible regardless of consequences as long as the weak remain shielded.

In a PeaceWorld Agora much more responsive than our lash-up politics on WeaponWorld, those responsible for human suffering otherwise avoidable would be ejected from power. Guilt and regret for one’s misdeeds would become major deterrents ― no matter what the cost in the meantime. The current practice of disguising moral failure in anonymity would be forbidden, as much during trivial spats on the Internet as during serious institutional misdeeds.

For example, the 2006 murder of Anna Politkovskaya, the intrepid journalist who served as a steadfast conscience for the Russian State – whatever the cost – should be laid at the feet of Vladimir Putin whose birthday was the day of her murder, and of his murderous crony, Ramzan Kadyrov, head of the Russian Chechen State.

The following heroes have been murdered in Russia, most of them without serious investigation or follow-up arrest except for usual suspect enforcers.


Nadezhda Chaikova, correspondent kidnapped and shot in Chechnya, 1996

Galina Starovoitova, 1998

Igor Domnikov, 2000

Sergei Yushenkov, 2003

Yury Shchekochikhin, 2003

Paul Klebnikov, 2004

Alexander Litvinenko, 2006

Ivan Safronov, 2007

Magomed Yvloyev, 2009

Vyachsla Yaroshenko, 2009

Stanislav Markelov, 2009

Anastasia Babourova, 2009

Natalia Estemirova, 2009

Serguei Magnitsky, (beaten to death in police custody), 2009

Edouard Tchouvachov, 2010

Rouslan Akhtakhanov, 2011

Gazbek Guekkiiev, 2012

Alexander Perepilichnyy, 2012

Mikhail Beketov (beaten into a coma and multiple amputations, 2008), 2013

Boris Berezovsky, 2013

Boris Nemtsov, 2015

Vladimir Kara-Murza (poisoned twice, comatose), 2015

Pavel Cheremet, 2016

Denis Voronenkov, 2017

Nikolai Andrushchevko, 2017


Other state-sponsored assassinations have gone unreported by the Western Press (54 journalists from 1992 to 2013). Russia will never recover its slava (glory) until it shields their replacements with as much forethought as the impulsiveness with which it sacrificed those listed above, as well as many more martyrs.

It would be unthinkable for legitimate leaders to waste those national treasures and terrorize their replacements. On PeaceWorld, such a disgrace would get those office holders ejected without appeal. Yet on WeaponWorld, they thrive from their inconceivable transgressions: another outcome of institutional stupidity. They are not alone, on the contrary. Almost every head of state on WeaponWorld would lose their war crime trial before the World Court.

Compared to most people I've reached out to, this guy was rather optimistic about the prospect of world peace. This planet’s sad burden of weapon stalwarts sorts itself out as follows: a majority that believes world peace is impossible, and a handful that suspects it might be worthwhile but unlikely in the near future when they would be personally responsible for it. Let someone else do the heavy lifting!

How convenient for him, babbling his platitudes! Needless to say, he wouldn’t lift a finger to help me in the meantime.

Take your time, Bubba. Be it for the next forty years or the last five thousand, your results always wind up the same. Weapon mentality prevails over you and your progressive hopes because you haven’t stepped forward to champion the cause of peace, despite all your fine talk.

One way or another, world peace will break out. Either our collective military insanity will kill almost everyone and the few survivors will default to peace, or Learners will rally and bring it about by design, voluntarily and soon.

Reactionaries won’t touch this topic because it betrays their primary motivation for themselves and for others: fear. Trendy progressives, equally fear-struck, dismiss this topic as already talked to death and thus neatly support the reactionaries, notwithstanding all their fine talk.



This text reviews the mentality of weapons and that of peace as if they were discrete, coherent and self-willed entities (memeplexes). Their schemes compete, grow strong or weak over time and influence mass thought. Peace and weapon mentors are spokespeople for invisible but mighty forces; their actions, statements and beliefs are constructive and destructive reflections of the collective superconscience. A few more thought-constructs may help us clarify this concept.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau spoke of the general will that prescribed the greatest common good for all: the basis of government legitimacy. Everyone could restrain their personal will yet still come out ahead in the long run since that is what the general will does best.

Western philosophers assert that it grows from the bottom up: from individuals to the pinnacles of government. The Chinese and their oriental disciples discuss a “Mandate of Heaven” prescribed by Confucius (Kong Fuzi, K'ung-fu-tzu), which renders legitimacy to government by virtue of its ritual harmony with cosmic law. It grows from the top down to personal depths.

Each has been considered mandatory for good governance by its supporters. I suspect they are basically the same. Cosmic law, government authority and individual freedom: all three would work best if in good accord with each other. Upset this optimal resonance at any level and suffer disaster as the system shakes itself to pieces. Without the general will, we would sink into chaos; without government power, things would fall apart. They’ve already done so in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (no taxes, no government, no law except at gunpoint: a Republican paradise managed by international corporate greed). Without the Mandate of Heaven, mass rebellion would become mandatory as climate chaos and famine spin out of control. We are passively waiting for this fate to befall the world and shake us awake.

The government serves as the central tuning fork of this system of harmonic resonance.

Freud spoke brilliantly about the subconscious. Personally, I am unaware of it (just kidding). Nowadays, everyone recognizes that they are fitted out with a set of subconscious impulses.

Carl Gustav Jung talked about the collective unconscious from which spring strangely consistent archetypes and synchronous phenomena. Every culture commemorates those spooky super-coincidences. Jung said the collective unconscious contains the sum of every forgotten thought and of all those in the future. Meanwhile, each conscious mind bears an assortment of current thoughts. Or receives and converts it like a fine-tuned antenna?

Might some psychotics have had their antennae fine-tuned to frequencies slightly different from those of normal people? Could this be why primal societies did not marginalize them the way we do today (through homelessness and/or prison institutionalization), but valued them and held them close by? Because they were tuned to an alien FM transmitting stations instead of AM reactionary talk shows that throb like sore teeth across the USA? Could their outlandish signals have turned out to be handy in a pinch?

Where do these ideas come from? I submit that they emanate from the collective superconscience.

The collective unconscious would be more like a storage battery: transitory and mutable, subject to the limitations of current thought and human geography. Whereas the collective superconscience would act like a fluid (a magneto-hydrodynamic plasma?) circuit board that operates in parallel with human communities, diagramming the flow, accumulation and dispersal of their currents ― burning out certain circuits and allowing others to proliferate in size and complexity.

Let’s hope our few peaceful circuits multiply and intertwine luxuriantly while many weapons circuits short each other out without effect. I believe in miracles under the watchful eye of a Loving God. The rest is up to us.

Emile Durkheim evoked the collective conscience as an intangible social framework beyond which criminals stray, rather like the out-of-bounds lines of a ball game. These transgressions (“How could he do that!”) reinforce normative rules most of us live by, that bind us more closely together.

World peace could crop up between these lines, and organized warfare, once central, could fall outside of them.

Noam Chomsky proposed a Universal Grammar: that we are somehow hard-wired with language skills. Jung likewise spoke of racial memory: the ability of a people to retain facets of its past. Hinduism and other religions mention the akasha: a universal etheric field that imprints a record of every past event and permits predictions of the future, per The Oxford Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, Elizabeth Knowles, Ed., Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 17.

I’ve barely skimmed these topics. Humanity has only scratched their surface and forgotten what little it knew about them in the past. Future Learners will study them in depth. There is a fantastic potential for scientific breakthroughs here that could eclipse our discoveries up to now: vaccines for our cultural complaints and shortcuts through our technological labyrinths.

Other researchers have studied morphic fields that bathe living tissue in auras similar to those captured by Kirlian photography. Morphic fields may explain the strange way germ plasma achieves unlikely symmetry and blueprint speciation.

During billions of years, chemical reactions frothed up from a primordial soup of organic molecules shot through with lightning bolts. From this shocked broth emerged entities more and more complex until, eons later, the sea bottom was littered with player pianos! Imagine how much simpler this scenario would be, compared to the evolution of life. I can’t recall the author of this anecdote (J.B.S. Haldane?). His example replaced player pianos with IBM Selectric typewriters: splendid tools, soon to be forgotten. Another writer evoked a string of tornados that would have swept across a vast junkyard to assemble a jumbo jet.

In the absence of morphic fields, the dominant life form on Earth might have been a fifteen-foot thick (so sunlight could shine through it) layer of translucent slime wrapped around the globe. This layer might not have left a trace after its disappearance from Earth. It might have thrived for eons (from time to time or for a long time uninterrupted) without our having noticed it.

Something else promotes a far richer, more mobile and adaptive diversity within a finite toolkit of inheritable traits. After all, slime mold and humans share the same four DNA nucleotides and 64 codons formed from them, whose common codes and shifting patterns of assembly distinguish every Self from every Other. Some unknown field casts a cloak over every organism ― keeps it alive, whole and distinct from the rest of the world yet attaches it to the world in profound ways, we and they alike.


The greatest Jewish Learner of the Kabbala was Isaac Luria, (Yitzhak Lurya יִצְחַק לוּרְיָא, Yitzhak Ben Shlomo Ashkenazi, and Yitzhak Ashkenazi. He is also known as Ari אֲרִי and He-Ari ("The Lion") from the acronym for Ashkenazi Rabbi Itzhak ("The Ashekanic Rabbi Yitzhak"), thus Arizal with "ZaL" being the acronym for Zikhrono Livrakha ("of blessed memory" or literally "let the memory of him be for a blessing"), a common honorific for Jews deceased, also known as Ari Ha-Kadosh ("Ari the Holy"). I name him so thoroughly for two reasons: 1) to honor his genius; and 2) so that search engines guide those interested in him to this text.


Translating Luria into simplistic terms on behalf of Learners and in accordance with my limited understanding: he posited the principle that God created the Universe by making room for it outside His Perfection; somewhat the way a man might inhale sharply to make way for someone passing him along a narrow passageway.

According to Luria, the shock of this transition induced the worldly dichotomy between good and evil. The Divine Light that had filled all things, flowed from the eyes, nose and mouth of Adam: a Light so bright the material world could not cope with it. Three upper vessels of the Universe cracked and seven lower ones shattered in a shower of Holy Sparks. Those elements that resisted this shattering became Evil while those that suffered it remained Good.

As for me, I suppose that the conflict between good and evil is a fission-fusion reactor that splits God into good and evil sub-particles and then back again every Planck second. This vibration energizes the material Universe and the DNA of life perched within it. Without good and evil, there would be no power from their conflict and absolute zero everywhere. Which might be the ultimate point of the exercise?

According to him, whenever a human being obeys a commandment of God, he “repairs the world” by raising another spark from the depths of evil to the height of good. Hebrew ritual life is intended to raise the most good, no matter how trivial the act of obedience. Correspondingly, any deviation from the commandment of God drops another Spark to lower levels. In this way, the practicing Jew carries out an existential struggle equivalent to the myth of Sisyphus; he bears a Holy Spark upwards to the Light despite a cascade of downward ones showering him and his burden. And God has a cosmic need for humanity to restore His Holy Order.

What does that mean for the rest of us? That we should obey the commandments we understand best from any God of our choosing, to restore the Holy Sparks of God to their proper place. The foremost among them, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you;” which includes among its subsets, “Thou shalt not kill.” This governs every religious law we recognize ― whether upheld by an honest Pagan, Kantian, agnostic or atheist, and would be best served by working hard for World Peace.





Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird, in Secrets of the Soil: New Age Solutions for Restoring our Planet, Harper Collins & Row, 1989, assert they’ve discovered devas. These devas have identified themselves as spirit architects of various plants, animals and other kingdoms ― in other words, communicating forms of the morphic field we are talking about.

New-Age naturalists admit to having communicated with them at Findhorn and elsewhere. By their account, these devas, more and more abused by humanity, have withdrawn to their last brambles of wilderness to await our mechanized self-destruction. Apparently, they would rather communicate with sensitive naturalists among us and rebuild a framework of mutual understanding and cooperation: the same one we’ve spent the last few thousand years ripping out to compensate for our sickness of spirit.

This provided we reciprocated with love. In this context, love means pragmatic care, empathy and forethought at which our species excels; not the sentimentality, positivism and dogmatic hypocrisy we’ve mistaken for the real McCoy.

Forswearing the devil’s bargain of near-term abuse and long-term annihilation, Learner and deva mutualists could re-negotiate this partnership. Let’s assume we chose to follow their best-practice advice. Peace technology Genetic Architecture could generate unheard-of abundance while avoiding transgenic catastrophes and unintended consequences. Otherwise, if genetic engineers persist with their double blind fumblings, they will merely spawn deadlier weapon technologies along with their “unavoidable” disasters.


Rupert Sheldrake sails fearlessly beyond this thought horizon. In The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance & the Habits of Nature and A New Science of Life: the Hypothesis of Morphic Resonance he postulates the existence of morphic resonances. Among other things, they make it easier to do whatever has already been accomplished.

For example, randomly selected students find it easier to solve crossword puzzles the day after they have been published in newspapers and other people have solved them. The same students take longer to solve the same kind of puzzle before the public gets to see it. Unpublished control puzzles are no simpler or harder to solve over time.

Or just recall the four-minute mile: a routine accomplishment during the Olympiads these days, though once thought impossible.

I am pretty sure the writing of this text (especially in French) became less difficult for me – indirectly – as strangers read it and cringed at my many errors, even though they never told me about them (my late mother foremost, no doubt). I am fairly certain that our delicate minds are bundled in mysterious and imperceptible assemblies.

In short, good habits become easier to accomplish after they’ve been practiced elsewhere ― and bad ones, more difficult to abandon the longer and more often they’d been indulged.

Up ‘til now, humanity has made obsessive-compulsive war. From now on, we must practice peace with the same intensity. Willing co-conspirators with WeaponWorld, we’ve bleached the term “world peace” of its emotive power and let weapon mentors cheapen it into a punch line of a sick joke. From now on, we should turn warfare into an obscene joke and wage peace in deadly earnest.


As another example, periodic solar flares kindle auroras in polar skies; sometimes they fry electrical grids and satellites, curdle the blood’s albumin and turn passive crowds into angry mobs. There is no escape from their effect except sixty feet or deeper underground.

What appears to be the “undifferentiated vacuum of space” through which our solar system drifts, is actually a pea soup fog of subatomic particles/wavicles precisely attuned to the minute disturbances of distant celestial emissions: electromagnetic, gravitational and no doubt more subtle ones so far unregistered. This varying mix and quantum flux of space-time and beyond reaches down through the magnetic and atmospheric shielding of our planet and produces subtle effects on our thoughts and behavior.

During the last five thousand years, astrologers have barely scratched the surface of those effects. For the past three hundred, astrophysicists have not even bothered to notice them.

It was not for nothing that Newton burned out like a candle during the last years of his life. He was trying to reformulate astrology into a rigorous mathematical science ― minus half the planets, moons, asteroids, etc., that were only discovered after his death. A hero’s project, worth dying for, even if he had to leave it unfinished. Likewise, Johann Kepler and a long string of equivalent geniuses lost in the depths of time. This mathematical guideline would have eclipsed mere Newtonian physics and cubed the value of his legacy. Learners may access it as soon as they devote enough time and scientific attention to it.

Just as genetic adaptation and human mythology appear to sway to unfelt breezes, so I believe we interact with ethical fields that surround us, even (especially!) when we refuse to notice them. These fields often corrupt entire peoples, tempt elites into perilous self-indulgence and terrorize those who choose to resist them. As if the ratio of psychopaths and the conscientious had reversed itself.

That kind of horror arose in Assyria, Nazi Germany, Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Sri Lanka, Syria and around the site of your local mass grave (you’d be surprised how close to your home it lies). Monstrous misdeeds – unthinkable under other circumstances – became the norm. At other times, public compassion and grace propelled entire nations to new heights of social complexity.

We may be lucky and clever enough to witness a new wave of global enlightenment. God knows, we’ve witnessed a glut of the bloodthirsty kind: enough to kill or sicken everyone involved except for psychopaths immune to their own toxicity.

Then again, we could kill off a hundred times more people than died during WWII (sic) and still be left with billions of starving, glow-in-the-dark survivors with no viable infrastructure left to sustain them except that buried deep underground beforehand for the sole benefit of a handful of psychopathic Nazi wannabes.

But then again, we could become Learners by reading this book, mass-marketing it, and preventing this Ultimate Paroxysm.

These could be palpable trends of the collective superconscience. We have let invisible forces stampede us where they will and declared them nonexistent and lacking a mind of their own by popular consent. If we got slightly wiser, we could search them out fearlessly, cultivate the most useful ones and redirect the worst along their least toxic axes. The study of this topic is just resuming under the title Noetics. See Rupert Sheldrake above and elsewhere.


This text invokes PeaceWorld: the antithesis of WeaponWorld’s compulsive trial-and-recurring-error. We find ourselves trapped in the morphic resonance of post-industrial warfare, redundant and perfectly replaceable on PeaceWorld. We should think of PeaceWorld as a planetary theme park crafted to enchant its active architects as much as its passive clients, leaving no-one out in the cold against their will.

Let me repeat: that remains up to us.




Learner, begin